<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Understanding Comics (review: 4.5/5)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mlarson.org/2006/10/22/understanding-comics-review-455/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mlarson.org/2006/10/22/understanding-comics-review-455/</link>
	<description>this what i like</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 03:55:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mlarson.org &#187; Reinventing Comics (review: 3/5)</title>
		<link>http://www.mlarson.org/2006/10/22/understanding-comics-review-455/comment-page-1/#comment-182</link>
		<dc:creator>mlarson.org &#187; Reinventing Comics (review: 3/5)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 07:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mlarson.org/?p=162#comment-182</guid>
		<description>[...] Reinventing Comics is the middle child in the McCloud comics trilogy. I found it to be the weakest and least interesting of the three. (see my reviews of Making Comics and Understanding Comics) Not bad, but nothing special. McCloud himself sums up nicely:  I believe that Reinventing Comics has genuine flaws. The two halves don&#8217;t always work well together, the storytelling is frequently stiffer and less convincing, and my enthusiastic advocacy of online comics is rarely tempered by some of the bleaker, more pessimistic scenarios offered by other writers in recent years. It was a harder book to write than Understanding Comics and, from all reports, a harder book to read. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Reinventing Comics is the middle child in the McCloud comics trilogy. I found it to be the weakest and least interesting of the three. (see my reviews of Making Comics and Understanding Comics) Not bad, but nothing special. McCloud himself sums up nicely:  I believe that Reinventing Comics has genuine flaws. The two halves don&#8217;t always work well together, the storytelling is frequently stiffer and less convincing, and my enthusiastic advocacy of online comics is rarely tempered by some of the bleaker, more pessimistic scenarios offered by other writers in recent years. It was a harder book to write than Understanding Comics and, from all reports, a harder book to read. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 2/9 queries in 0.085 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: www.mlarson.org @ 2012-02-09 01:05:53 -->
